Abstract
This paper examines how Italian teenagers construct meanings, norms and boundaries around sexting within their everyday digital cultures. Drawing on six vignette-based focus groups with 49 participants aged 16–18 years, the study used a media practice approach to analyse how teenagers collectively interpret a hypothetical sexting vignette. Findings show that participants overwhelmingly rely on heteronormative scripts, reproducing the dominant “girl-sends-nude-to-boy” narrative and positioning boys as initiators, while girls bear the potential risks. Sexting was consistently framed through risk discourses—particularly the threat of non-consensual dissemination—leading girls to internalise fear, self-policing, and responsibility for managing potential harm. Peer gossip further reinforced these risk narratives, circulating cautionary tales that blurred the boundaries between consensual and non-consensual practices and sustained moral regulation among peers. In response, teenagers constructed informal boundaries distinguishing “appropriate” from “unsafe” sexting, often limiting acceptable practices to long-term relationships and less explicit content. These findings highlight how risk discourses, peer surveillance and entrenched gender norms constrain teenagers’ digital intimacies, particularly in an Italian context marked by limited sexuality education and persistent gender inequalities. The paper argues for research and pedagogical approaches that move beyond risk prevention to support teenagers’ rights to agentic digital intimacies.
